“A philosophical problem has the form: I don’t know my way about.” Wittgenstein on the Road

How to read Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus remains a contested question. Is the
book intended to advance a theory? Is it meant to lay out an atomistic metaphysics? A theory of
truth and meaning? A logical theory? Or does it aim at showing that such theories are impossible?
How does one get from its initial assertion that the world is everything that is the case to the conclusion that one must overcome its propositions to see the world in the right way? The Tractatus
maps, in fact, Wittgenstein’s trajectory of thought through the course of the First World War.
It follows the transformations of his thinking from his initial commitment to Russell’s logical
atomism to his subsequent struggle with the question of the meaning of life. Far from advancing
a philosophical proposition or a set of such propositions the work is meant to delineate, instead,
a new kind of philosophical practice in which the constant transformation of thought, the readiness to always see things in new ways is essential.

Wittgenstein on the limits of language

Our attempts to deal with “the problems of philosophy” go characteristically wrong because we don’t understand “the logic of our language.” There are limits to language and these delegitimize the endeavor to advance philosophical theories. If we are to resolve our philosophical problems, we must go about it in some…